Find out why choosing the right footbed is so important, the advantage of slip-resistant soles and how the Masai way of walking works for all
Birkenstock
The footbeds of these shoes are made of cork and natural latex and they are contoured in the shape of a healthy foot. This ensures proper weight distribution with raised arches and helps support the foot’s natural shape and structure. Since the cork/latex blend is pliable, it reacts to the body’s natural heat and over a period of time, it yields to the characteristics of the foot. So the longer you wear them, the more comfortable they are. Cork is also renowned for its antibacterial properties, its high degree of elasticity and its ability to insulate the foot.
Doctor's notes: It takes a long time to like wearing hard, natural soles. The harder the footbed, the more stress the user has to put on striking the footstep and moving on. This does tone down when the footwear wears down a bit.
Sunday, February 13, 2011
Wednesday, February 9, 2011
Don't Spend What You Don't Have
Write everything down
Holiday Spending Survival Guide
* 12 Ways to Avoid Impulse Buying. Read
* Beware of store-branded credit cards. Read
* Control spending without being a Scrooge. Read
* 10 healthiest mall meals. Read
* Save When You Shop. Read
* Save Receipts the Right Way. Watch
* Credit Card Payoff Calculator. Do
* More From The Money Coach. Go
It can be tough to finally admit exactly how much debt you're carrying. But if you're going to dig yourself out of debt like I did, you have to know precisely how much damage has been done.
The fastest way to get a snapshot of all of your credit card bills is to pull your credit reports.
Avoid other credit report websites — they often charge hidden fees.
2. Make a realistic budget
While it's not necessary to live like a pauper, it is smart to get a handle on your cash flow. That means creating a realistic home budget. Take a hard look at how much income you've got coming in the door each month, and what's going out.
Small changes in your spending habits can go a long way. Skipping Starbucks in favor of home-brewed coffee can save up to $50 a month. Switching to basic cable from a premium package can cut your monthly bill by up to $40.
3. Get help
The financial impact of the Great Recession has been felt far and wide, but credit counselors say older Americans have been particularly hard hit by the economic downturn. Nest eggs have shrunk and jobs for older workers remain scarce. So if you're grappling with debt, you're not alone — and you shouldn't be embarrassed to ask for help.
Find a free or low-cost credit counselor who can explain your options for dealing with debt. Two reputable organizations are the National Foundation for Credit Counseling and the National Foundation for Debt Management. Beware credit repair scams. Legitimate credit counselors can't and won't promise to eliminate your debt instantly in exchange for a high upfront fee.
Holiday Spending Survival Guide
* 12 Ways to Avoid Impulse Buying. Read
* Beware of store-branded credit cards. Read
* Control spending without being a Scrooge. Read
* 10 healthiest mall meals. Read
* Save When You Shop. Read
* Save Receipts the Right Way. Watch
* Credit Card Payoff Calculator. Do
* More From The Money Coach. Go
It can be tough to finally admit exactly how much debt you're carrying. But if you're going to dig yourself out of debt like I did, you have to know precisely how much damage has been done.
The fastest way to get a snapshot of all of your credit card bills is to pull your credit reports.
Avoid other credit report websites — they often charge hidden fees.
2. Make a realistic budget
While it's not necessary to live like a pauper, it is smart to get a handle on your cash flow. That means creating a realistic home budget. Take a hard look at how much income you've got coming in the door each month, and what's going out.
Small changes in your spending habits can go a long way. Skipping Starbucks in favor of home-brewed coffee can save up to $50 a month. Switching to basic cable from a premium package can cut your monthly bill by up to $40.
3. Get help
The financial impact of the Great Recession has been felt far and wide, but credit counselors say older Americans have been particularly hard hit by the economic downturn. Nest eggs have shrunk and jobs for older workers remain scarce. So if you're grappling with debt, you're not alone — and you shouldn't be embarrassed to ask for help.
Find a free or low-cost credit counselor who can explain your options for dealing with debt. Two reputable organizations are the National Foundation for Credit Counseling and the National Foundation for Debt Management. Beware credit repair scams. Legitimate credit counselors can't and won't promise to eliminate your debt instantly in exchange for a high upfront fee.
Skin-tillating ideas
Get that glow with time-tested ingredients that are easily available — in your refrigerator
Even in the days of yore when beauty was not so easy as squeezing a tube or pouring from a bottle, women — and men — managed to keep their skin glowing and healthy with as few blemishes as possible.
How? They turned to their pantries to feed the skin what they fed themselves. Indian royalty used Fuller's earth and ground gram mixed with herbs, sandal paste and essential oils. Egypt's Cleopatra was famous for bathing in donkey milk and the Europeans maintained their "peaches and cream" complexion with oatmeal and honey.
tabloid! on Saturday, therefore, decided to raid the pantry or, more likely, the refrigerator, to learn some of the simplest and oldest homemade masks to maintain a beautiful visage. Most of these are suitable for all skin types, but lemon juice and yoghurt can be swapped and oils added if you have skin tending towards the dry. Though all products presented here are natural, it's advisable to do a patch test for allergies before using anything full-on.
As with all facials, cleanse face and neck with a suitable face wash, and scrub if needed, before applying the mask. Keep masks on for not more than 15 minutes, unless otherwise mentioned.
Almond paste and honey
Excellent for dry skin as the oil in almonds will give you it the required nourishment and the honey will bring the glow. Soak 15-20 almonds overnight in a little water, grind to paste and add about a teaspoon of honey. Add a dash of milk if the paste seems too thick. Alternatively, grind dry almonds and mix with milk, honey, lemon juice and a few drops of rose water to make an excellent body scrub.
Rose petals, honey, milk and almond oil
Not only will this leave you smelling good, rose oil is known to contain chemical compounds that are proven antioxidants. It is also said to treat skin conditions, such as rosacea. Grind rose petals with milk into a paste. Add a teaspoon of honey and a few drops of almond oil.
Banana, honey and lemon juice or yoghurt
Bananas are full of vitamins and minerals, and moisturise skin leaving it looking fresh and soft. Mash a ripe banana to a smooth paste. Add a little lemon juice or yoghurt, depending on your skin type, and dash of honey.
Egg white
Another home special that some feel can leave you smelling, but is a great way to tighten your pores and give you a temporary facelift. Just separate two egg whites, whip them a little, if you wish, and apply to face and neck until it dries (about 15 minutes).
Oatmeal and honey
This age-old favourite is best for oily skin. Cook one-third cup fast-cook oatmeal with half cup water. Cool and thicken. Add quarter cup honey while cooling and mix well and apply a thin and even layer. The oatmeal tends to absorb excess oil in the skin.
Fuller's earth, rose water and milk
Another timeless favourite, this can be used every day. Mix Fuller's earth with milk and rose water and apply until it dries. Regular use clears blemishes and leaves you feeling clean and glowing.
Honey and lemon juice
For an instant fresh look, apply a mix of two tablespoons runny honey and half tablespoon lemon juice for ten minutes and wash off.
Potato juice
Not very well known but potato's astringent and antibacterial qualities can help reduce acne. Grate a potato and apply as is or mix potato juice with a few drops of rose water for a cooling effect. Or add a little honey and almond oil to grated potato for dry skin.
Glycerin, rose water and lemon juice
Mix two tablespoons of liquid glycerine (available in pharmacies and supermarkets) with a few drops of rose water and about a teaspoon of lemon juice. Apply to face and neck before sleeping and wash face in the morning with water. It leaves your skin glowingCan be done every night.
Gadget of the week: Harman Kardon BDS 5
What is it?
From the sound experts themselves, the BDS 5 is a versatile media player that will play Blu-ray discs and all kinds of DVD and CD formats.
What's special about it?
Apart from the fact that it has the Harman Kardon touch, the BDS 5 is a feature-rich audio/video receiver capable of speaking to most of the latest gadgets and devices you may have and also includes a 5.1-channel digital amplifier and all the latest in surround-sound system.
I don't see a speaker though.
Yes, this is only a receiver. You'll have to buy those separately or hook it up to existing speakers. The Harman House outlet at The Dubai Mall has some cool DSF deals and offers on speakers.
Remind me what's the deal with Blu-ray discs again?
Blu-ray discs are much like your CDs physically but have been specially designed to supersede the DVD. It's quite different from the DVD when we're looking at storage capacity, image resolution, disc construction and the player requirements.
Blu-rays can store up to 50GB of data while your DVD can do about 8GB. Also, regular DVDs have a standard resolution definition of 480, which is great for tube TVs (remember those?), while Blu-rays are designed for high definition 1080, great for all your latest flat screens. What's more, because of the way it's constructed, your regular DVD players cannot play Blu-ray discs while most Blu-ray players are now capable of playing any format, something the geeky guys call "backward compatibility".
So why haven't the Blu-rays taken over the world?
They will, eventually. Much like how we have subsequently graduated from video cassettes to VCDs and to DVDs, the Blu-ray's domination will surely come. More acceptance will lead to better sales that will, in turn, make the discs cheaper and therefore more accessible.
So what else can I do with the BDS 5?
You can play music from your iPod or iPhone via a dock (sold separately), create a realistic 5.1-channel sound field from just two speakers and a subwoofer, connect it to your home-computer network and play all sorts of media files, including MPEG-1, MPEG-2, MP3, WMA and JPEG. It is also compatible with either a 12cm or 8cm disc, has a USB port and is very easy to install. Oh, and did we say it's a Harman Kardon?
Tuesday, February 8, 2011
whitewater rafting, Cagayan de Oro
More than the famous Oro Ham, More than the sunshiny friendly people, Cagayan de Oro’s become renowned throughout the country as the premiere whitewater rafting destination in the Philippines.
Air fares on the upswing as jet fuel costs increase
Air travelers can expect to pay even more.
U.S. and foreign airlines are adding fuel surcharges — or increasing base fares — to deal with the rising fuel cost of jet fuel, which is going up with the price of crude oil.
United Continental (UAL) added $6 in surcharges for round-trip tickets Monday, says Rick Seaney, CEO of FareCompare.com, which closely monitors fares.
American Airlines (AMR) also raised base fares by $4 to $10 round trip on most routes about the same time United added its fuel surcharge, Seaney says. US Airways (LCC), Delta Air Lines (DAL) and AirTran (AAI) have also since matched the increases on some routes.
United subsequently dropped its surcharge, but rolled it into an increase in the base fare as American did. This round of fare increases, the industry's fifth since December, will likely stick, Seaney says.
"They didn't know whether to match either (the surcharge) or (the base fare increase)," he says. "Either way, we're going to have a hike."
Domestic travelers haven't paid fuel surcharges since November of 2008, when airlines eliminated them by rolling them into fares.
But oil prices are higher — at about $91 a barrel on Wednesday — and more fuel charges are likely coming. Those to feel them first: travelers to small cities or on routes where large network airlines face little competition, Seaney says.
Airline executives have been sounding the alarm about rising fuel prices for weeks. The International Air Transportation Association said Wednesday that the industry's profit worldwide would fall by 40% this year to $9.1 billion from last year based on oil at $84 per barrel.
*
MONEY TIPS: Get our free Personal Finance e-mail newsletter
*
FLIGHT NEWS: Our Today in the Sky community
*
ASK THE CAPTAIN: Retired pilot John Cox answers travel questions
Fuel accounts for 27% of operating costs, and a dollar increase in the average oil price adds an additional $1.6 billion in costs, the association says.
Fuel surcharges on international tickets — a mainstay of international fares — are also rising. Jet Blue recently added a $70 fuel charge on round-trip flights to Puerto Rico, and $90 to other parts of the Caribbean. On Tuesday, Air France increased fuel surcharges by between $2.80 and $146 one way, depending on the flight length.
Travel to most destinations in Europe carries a surcharge of $360, a 29% increase from a year ago, according to Tom Parsons, CEO of Bestfares.com.
"With the problems in the Middle East, speculation is that fuel may going back up," he says. "Whether you call it a fuel surcharge or fare hike ... prices will likely be higher."
U.S. and foreign airlines are adding fuel surcharges — or increasing base fares — to deal with the rising fuel cost of jet fuel, which is going up with the price of crude oil.
United Continental (UAL) added $6 in surcharges for round-trip tickets Monday, says Rick Seaney, CEO of FareCompare.com, which closely monitors fares.
American Airlines (AMR) also raised base fares by $4 to $10 round trip on most routes about the same time United added its fuel surcharge, Seaney says. US Airways (LCC), Delta Air Lines (DAL) and AirTran (AAI) have also since matched the increases on some routes.
United subsequently dropped its surcharge, but rolled it into an increase in the base fare as American did. This round of fare increases, the industry's fifth since December, will likely stick, Seaney says.
"They didn't know whether to match either (the surcharge) or (the base fare increase)," he says. "Either way, we're going to have a hike."
Domestic travelers haven't paid fuel surcharges since November of 2008, when airlines eliminated them by rolling them into fares.
But oil prices are higher — at about $91 a barrel on Wednesday — and more fuel charges are likely coming. Those to feel them first: travelers to small cities or on routes where large network airlines face little competition, Seaney says.
Airline executives have been sounding the alarm about rising fuel prices for weeks. The International Air Transportation Association said Wednesday that the industry's profit worldwide would fall by 40% this year to $9.1 billion from last year based on oil at $84 per barrel.
*
MONEY TIPS: Get our free Personal Finance e-mail newsletter
*
FLIGHT NEWS: Our Today in the Sky community
*
ASK THE CAPTAIN: Retired pilot John Cox answers travel questions
Fuel accounts for 27% of operating costs, and a dollar increase in the average oil price adds an additional $1.6 billion in costs, the association says.
Fuel surcharges on international tickets — a mainstay of international fares — are also rising. Jet Blue recently added a $70 fuel charge on round-trip flights to Puerto Rico, and $90 to other parts of the Caribbean. On Tuesday, Air France increased fuel surcharges by between $2.80 and $146 one way, depending on the flight length.
Travel to most destinations in Europe carries a surcharge of $360, a 29% increase from a year ago, according to Tom Parsons, CEO of Bestfares.com.
"With the problems in the Middle East, speculation is that fuel may going back up," he says. "Whether you call it a fuel surcharge or fare hike ... prices will likely be higher."
British Airways increases long-haul fuel surcharge
British Airways is increasing its fuel surcharge on long-haul flights for the second time in as many months because of recent oil price rises." That's from The Associated Press, which reports the carrier will add 12 pounds (about $19) to each long-haul flight starting on Tuesday.
AP says "that means that passengers will pay a surcharge of between 75 pounds and 125 pounds depending on the class of cabin and the length of the flight. Surcharges on BA's short-haul flights will be unchanged."
For U.S. travelers, the effect of the surcharge will be a higher fare. U.S. law bars airlines from advertising fares without including mandatory fuel surcharges.
As for BA, AP notes "the company last raised the long-haul fee in mid-December — then the first rise in more than two years — because of soaring oil prices."
AP says "that means that passengers will pay a surcharge of between 75 pounds and 125 pounds depending on the class of cabin and the length of the flight. Surcharges on BA's short-haul flights will be unchanged."
For U.S. travelers, the effect of the surcharge will be a higher fare. U.S. law bars airlines from advertising fares without including mandatory fuel surcharges.
As for BA, AP notes "the company last raised the long-haul fee in mid-December — then the first rise in more than two years — because of soaring oil prices."
Ban babies on board?
Ban babies on board. Stop kids from flying altogether or at least create a special children’s section on planes.
That’s what a growing number of frequent travelers want to do. Passengers like Linda Rolle, an executive administrative associate, parent and grandparent from Denton, Texas.
“I’ve have had some horrible experiences,” she says. “Once, a 2-year-old finished his bottle and heaved it over his head and it landed on my head. Large bump, large headache, no blood. Also, no apology from mommy – only giggles and ‘isn’t he cute’.”
On another flight, a toddler in the seat in front of her “kept standing up and leaning over the seat to see what was going on. I did not mind this until he drooled into my lap,” she remembers.
Children are ubiquitous on flights these days. Nearly one-half of U.S. adults recently polled by the Travel Industry Association of America said they included kids on a trip during the past five years. The most dramatic rise in juvenile passengers came from corporate travelers. In 1997, 24.4 million business trips included a child, compared with 7.4 million business trips a decade earlier. That’s an increase of 230 percent.
Any surprise, then, that the number of complaints about kids is on the rise? Not to Jerry Clavner, a sociology and anthropology professor from Cleveland.
“Traveling on a domestic airline with children on board is like traveling with a Chihuahua with diarrhea,” he says. “Kids are hyperactive and they can’t control themselves. The plane is an unnatural environment, and you’re going to get bizarre behavior. I mean, why would you think children can sit on a flight for more than two hours, when their average attention span is 14 minutes, which is the space between commercials?”
Clavner says airlines and parents are “inflicting pain on people who are in a rush to get somewhere” and it needs to stop. “I have never inflicted my children on anyone else on an airplane,” he adds. “If we cannot get there by car comfortably with a child, why would I want to go anyway?”
D.J. Cotton, a former flight attendant for Pan Am who now lives in Los Gatos, Calif., knows the children won’t go away. But she has a few ideas about how to deal with them. Sedate infants before the flight, for starters.
“The baby sleeps, the flight crew and passengers arrive relaxed,” she says. If that fails, she adds, airlines should offer “optional parachutes for planes with screaming babies.”
Gregory Gulley-Purcell, a marketing coordinator for a specialty insurance company in Bellevue, Wash., suggests a less radical approach. “If the airlines created a separate compartment, akin to the first-class one, it could be used to accommodate families and adults traveling with children,” he says.
“I don’t think all kids are troublemakers, but the fact does remain that they have a lot more energy than should be contained in the over-crowded, constricted airline cabins of today.”
And how about the crewmembers? Adana Adams, who works for a medical research company in Urbana, Ill., and is the mother of three grown children, thinks the problem isn’t the kids or even the parents, but the flight attendants. She says crewmembers don’t enforce the seatbelt rules consistently, letting children run around the cabin to their hearts’ content.
When she complained about one kid’s behavior on a recent flight, she was told her predicament was her “tough luck.” Is it the flight attendants, the kids, the parents or just the stress of sitting in a pressurized cabin? I don’t know who, or what, is to blame.
One thing I’m sure of: I’m not one to talk. I was an enfant terrible back in 1969, when I took my very first flight from New York to Munich at age 1. I screamed, ranted, kicked, whined and fussed. Not unlike what I do today, except louder. I don’t feel like I have the right to criticize a couple of rowdy kids.
Among the most level-headed solutions, I think, is Stevanne Auerbach’s. The director of the Institute For Childhood Resources in San Francisco says it’s up to the adults to fly prepared. “You need appropriate games, puppets and activities to keep kids occupied,” she told me.
Put differently, it’s not a bad idea to pack a sock puppet on your next trip. Who knows, it may shut the kid next to you up.
Note: Five years after this article first appeared, Adams, who works for a hospital in a medical research department, contacted this site to request her name be deleted from the story. She said her quote was inaccurate.
“My complaint was that I had requested a window seat so that my elbow that was in a cast would not be bumped and when I got on the plane, a couple with a toddler had boarded early and taken my window seat and refused to move,” she wrote. “The four hours from San Diego was spent with a wild toddler bumping my broken elbow the entire time and flight attendants who refused to do anything about it.”
ANONYMOUS
That’s what a growing number of frequent travelers want to do. Passengers like Linda Rolle, an executive administrative associate, parent and grandparent from Denton, Texas.
“I’ve have had some horrible experiences,” she says. “Once, a 2-year-old finished his bottle and heaved it over his head and it landed on my head. Large bump, large headache, no blood. Also, no apology from mommy – only giggles and ‘isn’t he cute’.”
On another flight, a toddler in the seat in front of her “kept standing up and leaning over the seat to see what was going on. I did not mind this until he drooled into my lap,” she remembers.
Children are ubiquitous on flights these days. Nearly one-half of U.S. adults recently polled by the Travel Industry Association of America said they included kids on a trip during the past five years. The most dramatic rise in juvenile passengers came from corporate travelers. In 1997, 24.4 million business trips included a child, compared with 7.4 million business trips a decade earlier. That’s an increase of 230 percent.
Any surprise, then, that the number of complaints about kids is on the rise? Not to Jerry Clavner, a sociology and anthropology professor from Cleveland.
“Traveling on a domestic airline with children on board is like traveling with a Chihuahua with diarrhea,” he says. “Kids are hyperactive and they can’t control themselves. The plane is an unnatural environment, and you’re going to get bizarre behavior. I mean, why would you think children can sit on a flight for more than two hours, when their average attention span is 14 minutes, which is the space between commercials?”
Clavner says airlines and parents are “inflicting pain on people who are in a rush to get somewhere” and it needs to stop. “I have never inflicted my children on anyone else on an airplane,” he adds. “If we cannot get there by car comfortably with a child, why would I want to go anyway?”
D.J. Cotton, a former flight attendant for Pan Am who now lives in Los Gatos, Calif., knows the children won’t go away. But she has a few ideas about how to deal with them. Sedate infants before the flight, for starters.
“The baby sleeps, the flight crew and passengers arrive relaxed,” she says. If that fails, she adds, airlines should offer “optional parachutes for planes with screaming babies.”
Gregory Gulley-Purcell, a marketing coordinator for a specialty insurance company in Bellevue, Wash., suggests a less radical approach. “If the airlines created a separate compartment, akin to the first-class one, it could be used to accommodate families and adults traveling with children,” he says.
“I don’t think all kids are troublemakers, but the fact does remain that they have a lot more energy than should be contained in the over-crowded, constricted airline cabins of today.”
And how about the crewmembers? Adana Adams, who works for a medical research company in Urbana, Ill., and is the mother of three grown children, thinks the problem isn’t the kids or even the parents, but the flight attendants. She says crewmembers don’t enforce the seatbelt rules consistently, letting children run around the cabin to their hearts’ content.
When she complained about one kid’s behavior on a recent flight, she was told her predicament was her “tough luck.” Is it the flight attendants, the kids, the parents or just the stress of sitting in a pressurized cabin? I don’t know who, or what, is to blame.
One thing I’m sure of: I’m not one to talk. I was an enfant terrible back in 1969, when I took my very first flight from New York to Munich at age 1. I screamed, ranted, kicked, whined and fussed. Not unlike what I do today, except louder. I don’t feel like I have the right to criticize a couple of rowdy kids.
Among the most level-headed solutions, I think, is Stevanne Auerbach’s. The director of the Institute For Childhood Resources in San Francisco says it’s up to the adults to fly prepared. “You need appropriate games, puppets and activities to keep kids occupied,” she told me.
Put differently, it’s not a bad idea to pack a sock puppet on your next trip. Who knows, it may shut the kid next to you up.
Note: Five years after this article first appeared, Adams, who works for a hospital in a medical research department, contacted this site to request her name be deleted from the story. She said her quote was inaccurate.
“My complaint was that I had requested a window seat so that my elbow that was in a cast would not be bumped and when I got on the plane, a couple with a toddler had boarded early and taken my window seat and refused to move,” she wrote. “The four hours from San Diego was spent with a wild toddler bumping my broken elbow the entire time and flight attendants who refused to do anything about it.”
ANONYMOUS
How to fix your trip
If you’re reading this, something has gone wrong on your trip. Maybe your airline lost your luggage. Or your hotel couldn’t find your reservation — and left you homeless on vacation.
What now?
I’ve been mediating travel disputes my entire career, and I know what to do. I write the syndicated Travel Troubleshooter column every week and am National Geographic Traveler magazine’s ombudsman.
When vacations head south, I get the call.
But first of all, let me say “I’m sorry.” Chances are, you haven’t heard that yet from anyone — and if you have, it probably wasn’t sincere.
I’m sorry you had a negative experience. Really.
Now … about that call. Before you pick up the phone or fire off an e-mail to me, let me share a few insider tricks for fixing a derailed trip. You know, things like whom to write, what to say and where to go when no one listens.
If I had to distill everything into one simple rule, it would be: The sooner you speak up, the better your chances of getting what you deserve.
But I’m getting ahead of myself. Here are my strategies for making things right when they’ve gone wrong:
Don’t wait. Instead of writing a letter or calling when you get home, mention your problem before you check out, deplane or disembark. The person behind the counter frequently is empowered to fix the problem on the spot. Leave without saying something, and you’ll have to deal with an outsourced call center where operators have 50 ways (or more) to say “no.”
Keep meticulous records. When you’re having the vacation from hell, record-keeping is critically important. Take snapshots of the bedbug-ridden hotel room or the rental car with a chipped windshield. Channel Perry Mason. Keep all e-mails, brochures, tickets and receipts. In extreme cases, I’ve even seen travelers print screen shots of their reservation to prove they made it.
Take a deep breath. Stay calm. Even though you may feel like ranting about your trip, resist the temptation. You’re going to need to stay focused to get what you want from the company. If you have to, take a few hours before sitting down in front of a typewriter or computer to compose a letter. A levelheaded letter is far likelier to get results than a threatening one.
Talk is cheap. Picking up the phone may seem like the easiest way to register disapproval with a travel company. For immediate gratification, there’s nothing like chewing someone out by phone. In fact, the phone can be problematic because no usable paper trail is created. (Although many companies record call-center conversations, you won’t have access to those tapes.) It’s better to do everything in writing.
Write tight and polite. The most effective e-mails and letters are very short — no more than one page, or about 500 words. They include all details necessary to track your reservation, such as confirmation numbers and travel dates. They’re polite, dispassionate and free of spelling errors. There’s a real person on the other end of the process reading the e-mail or letter, so something as seemingly insignificant as bad grammar can determine whether your complaint is taken seriously or taken to the circular file.
Read the file. If you’re dealing with a big travel company, chances are I’ve got a file on it with helpful hints on its customer-service record and the best way of contacting it. Check out your company’s file.
Start at the bottom. If you’re already back from your vacation and need to contact a travel company, go through channels. Give the system a chance to work. It may. Then again, it may not. Start by contacting the company through its customer-service department. The point of this exercise is to collect evidence that you gave the company an opportunity to make things right. That could be important later if the company tries to blow you off and you need to go to court.
Cite the rules. Your complaint has the best chance of getting a fair shake if you can convince the company that it didn’t follow its own rules or broke the law. Airlines have what’s called a contract of carriage: the legal agreement between you and the company. Cruise lines have ticket contracts. Car-rental companies have rental agreements, and hotels are subject to state lodging laws. You can ask the company for a copy of the contract or find it on its Web site.
Tell them what you want, nicely. I’ve already mentioned the importance of a positive attitude. I’ll say it again: Be extra-nice. The two most common mistakes that people make with a written grievance are being vague about the compensation they expect and being unpleasant. Also, make sure that you’re asking for appropriate compensation. I’ve never seen an airline offer a first-class, round-trip ticket because flight attendants ran out of chicken entrees.
Copy all the right people. Yes, customer-service representatives review the list of everyone you copied on an e-mail or letter. When they see you’ve shared a grievance with a few other folks, it will give the complaint more weight. The people you copy will depend on the type of grievance. Just think of it as the exclamation mark at the end of your letter. Here’s who else to send your letter to.
Press ‘send’ or mail. E-mail is a perfectly acceptable way to file a grievance. A few things to keep in mind: If you use a Web-based form, keep a copy of the letter (don’t just type directly into the form and hit “send” because you won’t have a copy). Make sure your subject line describes the grievance. “Flight 123 query from passenger Jones” is preferable to “I’LL NEVER FLY ON YOUR AIRLINE AGAIN.” If you need a return receipt, snail mail still works best.
Be patient. The typical grievance takes six to eight weeks to resolve. Yes, six to eight weeks. A lot of them are faster, but many routinely test the eight-week limit. There’s no excuse for dragging things out, of course, but patience is a must when dealing with travel companies.
Turned down? Get it in writing. Don’t accept “no” for an answer by phone. Ask the company to put it into an e-mail or letter. That way, you have something to add to your file. I hope you won’t be rejected, but if you are, you want cold, hard proof that the company gave you a thumbs-down. No worries, you’re not out of options.
Appeal to a higher authority. Did you get a form letter politely asking you to take a hike? It’s not over. Every travel company has a vice president of customer service or a manager who is in charge of dealing with passengers or guests. That’s who needs to hear from you next. These executives go to great lengths to keep their names and contact information from becoming public. But a quick online search will reveal the contact person. I list many of them on my site.
Take another deep breath. Don’t overreact. Simply enclose copies of all of the correspondence with a cover letter to the VP, politely asking the company to reconsider its decision. Copy the same group of people. Be pleasant and nonthreatening, but firm.
Take extreme measures. If the company still says “no,” you should consider the “Hail Mary,” a respectful but insistent letter overnighted directly to the chief executive officer along with the disappointing string of “nos” you’ve received. This is a little-known loophole in the system. Something FedExed to the top exec has an excellent chance of being read by that person. Another last-ditch option: Consider disputing the charge on your credit card.
Go to court. Most travel-related issues would be handled by a small-claims court, which doesn’t require that you hire a lawyer. Travel companies like going to court about as much as the average person does, so filing a complaint may be enough to get the airline, car rental company or hotel to see things your way.
Know when to say when. Sometimes, the cost of pursuing a complaint, in both time and money, outweighs the benefits. Going after a travel company for nothing more than an apology may not be the most productive thing to do. Pick your battles.
Troubleshooting a trip isn’t difficult. With the right information, a positive attitude, realistic expectations and, above all, patience, you can resolve 99 percent of all travel grievances. The other 1 percent? That’s my department.
anonymous
What now?
I’ve been mediating travel disputes my entire career, and I know what to do. I write the syndicated Travel Troubleshooter column every week and am National Geographic Traveler magazine’s ombudsman.
When vacations head south, I get the call.
But first of all, let me say “I’m sorry.” Chances are, you haven’t heard that yet from anyone — and if you have, it probably wasn’t sincere.
I’m sorry you had a negative experience. Really.
Now … about that call. Before you pick up the phone or fire off an e-mail to me, let me share a few insider tricks for fixing a derailed trip. You know, things like whom to write, what to say and where to go when no one listens.
If I had to distill everything into one simple rule, it would be: The sooner you speak up, the better your chances of getting what you deserve.
But I’m getting ahead of myself. Here are my strategies for making things right when they’ve gone wrong:
Don’t wait. Instead of writing a letter or calling when you get home, mention your problem before you check out, deplane or disembark. The person behind the counter frequently is empowered to fix the problem on the spot. Leave without saying something, and you’ll have to deal with an outsourced call center where operators have 50 ways (or more) to say “no.”
Keep meticulous records. When you’re having the vacation from hell, record-keeping is critically important. Take snapshots of the bedbug-ridden hotel room or the rental car with a chipped windshield. Channel Perry Mason. Keep all e-mails, brochures, tickets and receipts. In extreme cases, I’ve even seen travelers print screen shots of their reservation to prove they made it.
Take a deep breath. Stay calm. Even though you may feel like ranting about your trip, resist the temptation. You’re going to need to stay focused to get what you want from the company. If you have to, take a few hours before sitting down in front of a typewriter or computer to compose a letter. A levelheaded letter is far likelier to get results than a threatening one.
Talk is cheap. Picking up the phone may seem like the easiest way to register disapproval with a travel company. For immediate gratification, there’s nothing like chewing someone out by phone. In fact, the phone can be problematic because no usable paper trail is created. (Although many companies record call-center conversations, you won’t have access to those tapes.) It’s better to do everything in writing.
Write tight and polite. The most effective e-mails and letters are very short — no more than one page, or about 500 words. They include all details necessary to track your reservation, such as confirmation numbers and travel dates. They’re polite, dispassionate and free of spelling errors. There’s a real person on the other end of the process reading the e-mail or letter, so something as seemingly insignificant as bad grammar can determine whether your complaint is taken seriously or taken to the circular file.
Read the file. If you’re dealing with a big travel company, chances are I’ve got a file on it with helpful hints on its customer-service record and the best way of contacting it. Check out your company’s file.
Start at the bottom. If you’re already back from your vacation and need to contact a travel company, go through channels. Give the system a chance to work. It may. Then again, it may not. Start by contacting the company through its customer-service department. The point of this exercise is to collect evidence that you gave the company an opportunity to make things right. That could be important later if the company tries to blow you off and you need to go to court.
Cite the rules. Your complaint has the best chance of getting a fair shake if you can convince the company that it didn’t follow its own rules or broke the law. Airlines have what’s called a contract of carriage: the legal agreement between you and the company. Cruise lines have ticket contracts. Car-rental companies have rental agreements, and hotels are subject to state lodging laws. You can ask the company for a copy of the contract or find it on its Web site.
Tell them what you want, nicely. I’ve already mentioned the importance of a positive attitude. I’ll say it again: Be extra-nice. The two most common mistakes that people make with a written grievance are being vague about the compensation they expect and being unpleasant. Also, make sure that you’re asking for appropriate compensation. I’ve never seen an airline offer a first-class, round-trip ticket because flight attendants ran out of chicken entrees.
Copy all the right people. Yes, customer-service representatives review the list of everyone you copied on an e-mail or letter. When they see you’ve shared a grievance with a few other folks, it will give the complaint more weight. The people you copy will depend on the type of grievance. Just think of it as the exclamation mark at the end of your letter. Here’s who else to send your letter to.
Press ‘send’ or mail. E-mail is a perfectly acceptable way to file a grievance. A few things to keep in mind: If you use a Web-based form, keep a copy of the letter (don’t just type directly into the form and hit “send” because you won’t have a copy). Make sure your subject line describes the grievance. “Flight 123 query from passenger Jones” is preferable to “I’LL NEVER FLY ON YOUR AIRLINE AGAIN.” If you need a return receipt, snail mail still works best.
Be patient. The typical grievance takes six to eight weeks to resolve. Yes, six to eight weeks. A lot of them are faster, but many routinely test the eight-week limit. There’s no excuse for dragging things out, of course, but patience is a must when dealing with travel companies.
Turned down? Get it in writing. Don’t accept “no” for an answer by phone. Ask the company to put it into an e-mail or letter. That way, you have something to add to your file. I hope you won’t be rejected, but if you are, you want cold, hard proof that the company gave you a thumbs-down. No worries, you’re not out of options.
Appeal to a higher authority. Did you get a form letter politely asking you to take a hike? It’s not over. Every travel company has a vice president of customer service or a manager who is in charge of dealing with passengers or guests. That’s who needs to hear from you next. These executives go to great lengths to keep their names and contact information from becoming public. But a quick online search will reveal the contact person. I list many of them on my site.
Take another deep breath. Don’t overreact. Simply enclose copies of all of the correspondence with a cover letter to the VP, politely asking the company to reconsider its decision. Copy the same group of people. Be pleasant and nonthreatening, but firm.
Take extreme measures. If the company still says “no,” you should consider the “Hail Mary,” a respectful but insistent letter overnighted directly to the chief executive officer along with the disappointing string of “nos” you’ve received. This is a little-known loophole in the system. Something FedExed to the top exec has an excellent chance of being read by that person. Another last-ditch option: Consider disputing the charge on your credit card.
Go to court. Most travel-related issues would be handled by a small-claims court, which doesn’t require that you hire a lawyer. Travel companies like going to court about as much as the average person does, so filing a complaint may be enough to get the airline, car rental company or hotel to see things your way.
Know when to say when. Sometimes, the cost of pursuing a complaint, in both time and money, outweighs the benefits. Going after a travel company for nothing more than an apology may not be the most productive thing to do. Pick your battles.
Troubleshooting a trip isn’t difficult. With the right information, a positive attitude, realistic expectations and, above all, patience, you can resolve 99 percent of all travel grievances. The other 1 percent? That’s my department.
anonymous
glimpse of dolphins
Explore takes a boat ride in Oman to catch a glimpse of dolphins at play in the ocean
Boracay getaway
"Stroke him!" our captain commanded as he hoisted a flapping, slimy stingray towards me, its cartoonish mouth hungrily sucking up fish from his hand.
Around us, maple-leaf-shaped stingray slithered across the sand and stubby reef sharks cruised by in the emerald water of Bora Bora's lagoon. I was sitting on a little boat with a tentative toe in the water, working up the courage to jump in and watching my mother squeal as a school of stingrays ballet-danced around her. I was on a cruise of the Society Islands, the most romantic destination on Earth, with my mum and some hungry fish.
The South Pacific islands of French Polynesia are a paradox — they attract honeymooners but hold a natural beauty that men will merrily leave their wives for.
In love with simplicity
French artist Paul Gauguin did this in 1891 when he left his young family to sail to the South Seas to escape debt and discover a simpler life in Mataiea, Tahiti. He fell in love with the islands and made them his home. He died in the Marquesas Islands in 1903. Gauguin would certainly have approved of his namesake cruise ship MS Paul Gauguin and the attractive Tahitian hostesses, "Les Gauguines", who, clad in brightly coloured pareos (sarongs), treat passengers to tales of island life and demonstrate the traditional ote'a dances.
MS Paul Gauguin was specially designed to sail the South Pacific's shallow lagoons. She is built for romance but was also ideal for a relaxing mother-daughter cruise. My mum and I went for Tahitian-style massages in the spa; tried, and failed, at water sports; and talked to some of the 332 guests at dinner in L'Etoile every night.
This is not a ship for dieters — the food was mouth-watering and included local fish such as wahoo or mahi mahi. We would do extra laps at the pool to work off the creamy coconut beverages or cakes served at afternoon tea.
The ship has a water-sports marina, where we collected snorkels, kayaks, water-skis and windsurfers.
Subtle yet notable
After leaving Tahiti, our first stop was Raiatea, where we took a bus trip to see the interior. French influences are seen in unexpected places; among the orange hibiscus, ripe bananas and papayas, and there were long, thin metal boxes by each house, where fresh baguettes are delivered daily.
The air was heady with the sweet smell of the islands' official flower, the tiare (gardenia), found all over French Polynesia. A strange energy hummed through Raiatea, once the religious centre of the islands and home to Taputapuatea, the most important marae (temple) in Eastern Polynesia. Rounded volcanic rocks formed an open-air sacred place with tiki figures standing guard.
We swapped tikis for our bathing suits the next day at Motu Mahana, a sand islet adjacent to Taha'a, where we tried snorkelling and saw brightly coloured fish and the coral reef. At Bora Bora there was another excursion to a private beach, with awesome views of the aquamarine lagoon and the famous craggy basalt giant of Mount Otemanu that rises out of Bora Bora.
We also had two days in Moorea and whiled away one relaxing on a catamaran cruise that took us to Cook's Bay, round the corner from where Captain James Cook landed in 1777 at Opunohu Bay. The Bounty anchored there 12 years after Cook.
I had fallen in love with the beautiful tropical paradise.
mayet
Athens, a capital of diversity
6pm: Start your visit from the heart of the city, Syntagma Square, just below the Greek parliament. Go down the pedestrian walkway of Ermou, the city's most popular shopping street. Browse or shop until you get to Kapnikarea — an 11th-century church built on the ruins of an ancient Greek temple — and turn left towards the Plaka district, below the Acropolis.
7pm: Plaka, the ancient city's oldest neighbourhood, boasts nicely renovated houses on narrow streets, a plethora of tavernas and souvenir shops. Find the Aerides Square, where overlapping layers of Greek history unfold before your eyes — the Classical Acropolis temples, the Hellenistic Tower of the Winds, the Roman Agora, Byzantine and Ottoman ruins.
8.30pm: Have dinner in Plaka, either at the busy Byzantine restaurant (18 Kydathineon) on Filomouson Etairion Square, a lively spot where you can enjoy traditional Greek cooking and watch crowds go by. Or go up the steep stone steps to Psara's (16 Erehtheos) for fresh fish. Sit under the tree and experience Athens as it must have been 200 years ago, not a single modern building in sight.
SATURDAY
9am: Stroll through the National Gardens, on V Amalias avenue, towards Hadrian's Arch and the majestic ruins of the Temple of Zeus, and take the main pedestrian walkway of D Aeropagitou to the modern New Acropolis Museum, which hosts the famed Parthenon Marbles — whatever Lord Elgin left behind — and replicas of the ones which are now in the British Museum in London. Make sure you look down the glass floor as you enter to view the ruins found during the construction of the museum, which also boasts some earlier finds from the Acropolis, such as archaic statues. Take a break at the museum's nice outdoor café before you begin your trek up Acropolis hill.
11am: Walk up the pedestrian street, past the Herod Atticus Theatre, which still hosts summer performances, and climb up the Acropolis hill. Make a stop to catch your breath at the top of the huge marble Propylaia steps and get your first glimpse of the Parthenon. Tour the Classical temples, stunning remnants of the Golden Age of Athens.
12.30pm: Come down and finish your walk around the hill along A Pavlou street all the way to Thissio, past views of the Ancient Agora, ancient Greece's gathering spot where Socrates and other philosophers taught, the Attalus Stoa and the well-preserved Temple of Hephestos. Have lunch at Kuzina (9 Adrianou), a pleasant, lively Greek eatery with a modern twist on tradition on one of Athens's most pleasant streets. If the weather allows, opt for outdoor seating and enjoy the view.
2.30pm: Take a short hop on the metro from Thissio to Syntagma and walk to the Benaki Museum (1 Koumbari St, closes at 5pm on weekdays, except Thursday, when open until midnight with free admission), founded by a wealthy Greek collector from Alexandria. Enjoy a tour of Greek history — from prehistoric to modern times — beautifully displayed in a Neo-Classical mansion. Check out the excellent museum shop.
5pm: Walk to the nearby Kolonaki Square, where the number of designer shops rivals that of cafés. Have a refreshment with the fashionable crowd of Athens, who gather here to socialise and people-watch.
6pm: For the best spot in the city to enjoy the sunset, take the funicular (1 Aristippou) up to the top of Lycabettus Hill, visit the small church of St George and take in the panoramic vistas stretching to the Aegean Sea.
8.30pm: Walk back down to the posh Kolonaki area for dinner, either at Prytaneio (7-9 Milioni), a favourite spot of the area's hip crowd on a bustling pedestrian street or at Ouzadiko (25-29 Karneadou).
SUNDAY
9am: Start your day with a visit to the National Archaeological Museum (44 Patission). The stately, 1880s' building houses a vast collection of ancient Greek art — world-famous marble and bronze statues, 16th-century BC frescoes from the island of Santorini and the gold treasure discovered by Heinrich Schliemann in Mycenae in 1876, including the "Mask of Agamemnon".
11am: Take a short taxi ride to the flea market of Avissinias Square, in the heart of Monastiraki. Visit the antique shops lining the square or the hundreds of peddlers spreading their goods on the ground. On Sundays, the area is packed with Athenians shopping and then sitting down for ouzo and meze at the numerous cafés.
1pm: For lunch, walk down Ermou street past the district of Psyri — where English poet Lord Byron fell in love with an Athenian girl — and make your way to the Gazi area. The impressive brick towers of the old gasworks factory hover over a sprawling art exhibition site, surrounded by fashionable cafés and eateries. Mamakas (41 Persephonis) serves Greek food the way mum would make it — if she were Greek — and Sardelles (15 Persephonis) has simple, fresh seafood.
3pm: Make your way back towards the Thissio area and visit the small, modern-art collection at the private Herakleidon Museum (16 Herakleidon). The beautifully restored, 1898 Neo-Classical building has developed many faithful fans since it opened its doors to visitors . End your Athens visit with a refreshments at any of the cafés across from the museum.
The Difference Between Tourists and Travellers
What is the difference between a tourist and a traveller?
It’s one of those quintessential questions among travellers (or should I say tourists?), popping up like a stubborn weed on forums and blogs. But is there even a difference, or are tourists and travellers one and the same?
Here’s how 21 travel bloggers see it.
Craig Heimburger from TravelVice:
Tourists expect toilet paper — travelers carry their own (with the carton roll removed and pressed flat).
Ant Stone from Trail of Ants:
If you gave a tourist £500, they will visit one place, for one week while trying to emulate the insight of the traveller. If you gave a traveller £500, they will visit five places over five weeks while trying to avoid the habits of a tourist. When they return home, the traveller will say “the tourist blew their money” while the tourist will claim “the traveller blew their time”.
Personally, I think travellers who snub their noses at tourists are short-sighted. I’ve met hundreds of so-called travellers over the past nineteen months who say such things as “I’m not going there, it’s so touristy!” I wait five minutes and then ask them what they’ve done with their day. Museum. Monument. Market. McDonalds. There was me thinking they’d been laying grain out to dry after digging a new rice paddy. For the record, I’m a travelling tourist, or is it a touristy traveller?
Gary Arndt from Everything Everywhere:
There is no difference. It is a distinction used by pretentious people to make themselves feel superior to others. To the locals, no matter how long you’ve been traveling or whatever your mindset is, you are still a tourist. After two years on the road, I’m still a tourist when I show up somewhere new.
A better distinction is between traveling and vacation, which is a distinction between what you are doing, not who you are.
Tourists expect toilet paper — travelers carry their own (with the carton roll removed and pressed flat).
Melanie McMinn from Intrepid 101:
A traveller enters a new place with an open mind and a hunger to experience.
I know when I say this my geek will be showing, but nothing says it better than the Monty Python Tourist Sketch:
What’s the point of going abroad if you’re just another tourist carted around in buses surrounded by sweaty mindless oafs from Kettering and Coventry… complaining about the tea – “Oh they don’t make it properly here, do they, not like at home”… squirting Timothy White’s suncream all over their puffy raw swollen purulent flesh ‘cos they “overdid it on the first day”…
And sending tinted postcards of places they don’t realise they haven’t even visited to “All at number 22, weather wonderful, our room is marked with an ‘X’. Food very greasy but we’ve found a charming little local place hidden away in the back streets…where they serve Watney’s Red Barrel and cheese and onion…”
Pam Mandel from Nerd’s Eye View:
In a semantic dispute, one could argue that a traveler is anyone engaged in the act of travel. I traveled to the post office yesterday, downtown to dine with friends. More semantics: A tourist is anyone who is not a local or, alternatively, one who is in a location to tour, to see the sites. The underpinnings of this question are clear, though, to anyone who reads about travel. My take: This question must die. There’s no difference. None.
Jacquie Ross from Travelling Right, Travelling Light:
Oh, the aura, the romance, the mystique of the ‘traveller’. It just sounds more adventurous, more gritty, more authentic than the ‘tourist’. I can scarcely spit out the confession, so painful is the suspicion that my own travels were really more ‘tourist’ than ‘traveller’. But maybe it’s unavoidable. As a thirty-something, mid-career ‘tourist’, I had a very strong sense of what I wanted to achieve from my travels and it didn’t include finding – or, for that matter, losing – myself. With time far more limited than budget, I moved more quickly and – on occasion – more luxuriously than the ‘traveller’, deliberate trade-offs that inevitably (for the ‘traveller’) draw into question the authenticity of my experiences. And yet, at heart, there can be no difference at all between us. The thirst to grow through travel compels only some of us to action. What each of us gains from the adventure is of our own making, and the means – whether as a ‘tourist’ or as a ‘traveller’- mere semantics.
Aaron Joel Santos from From Swerve of Shore:
The differences may look large and wide and all, but in the end they are as fickle and frail as anything else. The definition-type traveler or tourist does not care to be anything else. But we’re hardly ever as easy to peg down as a dictionary definition. I’ve toured and traveled. I’m guessing you have too. A real experience in an unknown place is a very subjective experience, so who is the traveler to say that the tourist does not experience anything real, or vice-versa? We all want to think of ourselves as travelers, but staying in a cheap dorm with other westerners or drinking on the roof of our hostel does not make us one. It’s being open and accepting of new cultures, of different ways of living. The goal of traveling is to learn about yourself and about the world, and anyone can do that if they try. Even tourists.
The goal of traveling is to learn about yourself and about the world, and anyone can do that if they try. Even tourists.
Shelly Rivoli from Travels with Baby:
A tourist visits a destination and accepts the visit as an end in itself, happy to have seen and conquered the place, then he moves on. A traveler, on the other hand, is a traveler wherever he roams. He sees every destination—even the post office and the corner grocery store in his own hometown—as a point of departure. His world is one of infinite possibilities and endless stories, and it is no wonder that so many great writers have been travelers at heart.
Greg Wesson from Greg Wesson’s Esoteric Globe:
A tourist is the idiot I curse at because they have stopped in the middle of the sidewalk during a busy rush hour RIGHT IN FRONT OF ME to take a picture of some obscure feature on a building that no one who is a local notices or cares about. A traveller, which is what I am, is someone who gets off the beaten tourist path and to see and experience that which others miss, for example, a unique and architecturally significant feature on a building in the heart of the city. I always stop and take a picture, even though sometimes the locals curse at me for stopping right in front of them.
Yup, travellers… We are so different than tourists. I’m also smarter, a better driver and frankly I am more above average than even those kids in Lake Wobegon.
Dave from The Longest Way Home:
I think there is a politically correct difference, and then a difference that both a traveller and tourist will conjure up in their own minds about one another. Much like a ‘backpacker’ or ‘expat may wish to separate themselves from the two classes as well. It is relative to the individual and to a large extent the person looking at them trying to figure it all out. With the PC version out of the way, let me give my own personal view as I travel.
I consider myself a traveller, but am of course looked upon as a tourist when travelling. I class short termers, weekenders, short hop family vacationers who stay in one country and so on; more as tourists than travellers. Backpackers, long-termers and so forth over multi regions; I look more on as travellers. Travellers and tourists: one and the same, albeit depending on who’s looking at who.
Brooke from Brooke vs. the World:
Literally, a tourist is “a person who travels for pleasure”, while a traveler is “a person who changes location”. (WordNet) Perhaps this means that a tourist is just a person looking for a vacation, while a traveler is a person always looking for new scenery and adventure. Perhaps this means a tourist is someone taking the safe route, sticking to the city walls and dragging a suitcase, while a traveler is fearlessly trekking mountain paths after downsizing their lives to a single backpack. Perhaps I should try to further compare and define these two debatable terms, or maybe I should just save us all time by letting you infer what you wish from the two definitions above. ;)
Tammie Dooley from Solo Road Trip:
There isn’t any. Being a tourist has been spoiled by a few bad apples, while travelers have been over-romanticized. There’s the occasional overbearing, insensitive boars, clutching their entitlements like carry-on luggage. Then there are travelers waxing poetically about the lack of an itinerary, mingling with the locals, eating from street stalls, tipping our noses at those staying in 5 star hotels, riding around in cushy buses, being led around like lambs with meals and breaks mandated. Two weeks into a four week backpacking trip in China, I wanted to sell my son to be one of them. We travelers are a snobbish lot. I’m also a flyfisherman. I know about snobbery. It’s ugly; I’m guilty. The world deserves to see the world – tourist or traveler. Curiosity should be encouraged. The experience of sating it is an individual choice. Besides, without tourists to make fun of, we’d founder on our arrogance.
Lauren O’Farrell from Purl Interrupted:
A tourist is someone who travels to get to a certain place, their destination is their aim. For a tourist the travelling part is a means to an end, a series of connections and seats on transport. The adventure doesn’t start till the ‘getting there’ ends.
A traveller is someone who travels to travel. That twelve hour train journey drinking neat vodka with a giant beard of a Russian man while he tells you stories of his wild youth and slaps you on the back in an almost-painful gesture of fast friendship; the eight thigh-scraping hours you spend on lurching camel back to get to the desert sand dunes and sleep under the stars; the monkey who stole your cheese sandwich while you were waiting for your ‘luxury’ Indian bus to be repaired for the third time. All just as important as where you end up.
Lara Dunston from Cool Travel Guide:
I don’t buy into the ‘tourist vs traveller’ argument. I have too many bad memories of interminable discussions between backpackers when I was travelling around South America a decade ago. I couldn’t understand why my fellow ‘travellers’ weren’t more interested in discussing the place they were in and people they were meeting. As it turned out, it was because many weren’t even bothering to meet locals and weren’t really interested in getting beneath the skin of the places. They spent more time socialising at the hostel than they did out of it and appeared more consumed with the notion of being a ‘traveller’ and idea of ‘travelling’ than the actual reality. While they were all too ready to criticise ‘tourists’, i.e. those who travelled in big tour groups or individuals on arranged packages, from my own observations those ‘tourists’ were seeing more than their hotel room and were getting out and about and talking to locals, albeit local guides on organized excursions. For me the distinctions are superficial. The ‘grand tourists’ after all were the greatest travellers, spending years on the road, often months in a place, learning languages or the local art forms and traditions of different cultures. Yet to be a ‘tourist’ now is seen by those who identify themselves as ‘travellers’ as a negative label – to be a ‘sightseer’, ‘holidaymaker’ or day-tripper, someone who merely ‘passes through’ a place and gets a superficial experience of it – yet I don’t always think that’s true. I’m the last person to recommend an organized tour, but at the same time I don’t see ‘travellers’ as always travelling more authentically or more meaningfully than ‘tourists’. Whatever we want to call ourselves – or others – what’s more important than what we call ourselves is how we travel, how we experience a place and its people, how much we get out of that experience, and how much we give back. I see more value in focusing less on ourselves and our own identities and more on the world and the culture and people around us.
Debby from Tea, Sugar, a Dream:
The tourist might get the basics down, see some sights, take a few pictures, and go home, experiencing only the surface of a country. A traveler goes deeper.
A tourist, via definition, is somewhat similar to a traveler. But the connotation of a traveler, to me, implies a deeper intent than a tourist. Bermuda shorts, Hawaiian t-shirts, and white socks with sandals personifies a tourist. The tourist might get the basics down, see some sights, take a few pictures, and go home, experiencing only the surface of a country. A traveler goes deeper. A traveler explores the culture, the people, the traditions, the food, the lifestyles and inner workings of a country. A traveler gets more involved.
This is not to suggest that being a traveler is better than being a tourist, as there are some amazing sights to be seen, and I’m sure that many tourists appreciate where they are. But being a traveler demonstrates an understanding of this world that we all live in together.
Cate Dowman from Caffeinated Traveller:
The ongoing question and debate. Difficult to define as both share a common love for discovery but both are polar in thinking and style.
From my experience I think the difference has to do with awareness: The tourist is very much aware of who they are, what they are doing and why they are there.They know their role and don’t try to redfine it.
The traveller unfortunately, hasn’t reached that level of awareness yet. Too many people are stuck in this traveller mode.They are busy judging others travel style, but at the same time hanging around backpacker ghettos.Personally I wouldn’t put myself in either category and I’m sure many others wouldn’t as well. I would consider myself a hybrid – a cross between a tourist and a traveller, keeping all the good points. Perhaps we should coin a new word: travelist.
Nora Dunn from The Professional Hobo:
Being travel bloggers, I think we have all considered this dichotomy before. Rolf Potts writes somewhat indignantly about it in his most recent book, Marco Polo Didn’t Go There, suggesting that it is a pointless debate. And I can’t say I blame him; as much as people who believe they are “travelers” are staunchly against being “tourists”, the reality is that once we are on foreign ground, we may try to get off the beaten path or blend in, but we ultimately (usually) follow a well-trodden trail at some time. To me, the difference between a tourist and a traveler has become more about how long you stay somewhere, get to know the locals, and integrate into the community (if even for a short time), than it is about seeing the sights versus finding a dodgy place that tourists don’t go for the sake of being off the beaten path.
Anja Mutic from Ever the Nomad:
A traveler engages with the destination through interacting with people and respectfully exploring new landscapes. On the journey, a traveler seeks to capture the essence of the place and leaves with a deeper understanding of it. A tourist visits the destination for the pleasure and fun of a holiday. On the trip, a tourist seeks an intermission from everyday life and returns home with snapshots and souvenirs.
Thomas Stanley from America in 100 Days:
Today's travelers are very fortunate to have the wealth of readily available information that they do - from expert tourism books to online reviews and laptops to GPS technology. All of these things, however, offer the easy way through the expedition at hand. Sure, a preplanned itinerary may be tried and true, and you probably won't find many gifts from Dionysus at just any random sandwich shop. But it's making that judgment for yourself that separates the traveler from the tourist. The tourist is just that, in town for a tour and a taste of the local specialty. The traveler is out to blaze a trail, to savor every bite of whatever the waitress brings, and to reflect without anyone else's noise to distract.
Derek Turner from The World by Sea:
Tourist or traveler. At first glance, I thought it was nothing more than playful semantics. Yet as the terms have wrestled through my mind, I am convinced the difference is significant.
A tourist is a person whose motivation for travel is often to escape. Your aim: to find a beachside resort, or country cottage where for a moment in time you can forget about work and day-to-day stress… just relax. Someone else can cook, clean, and guide you to your daily destinations.
But a traveler is different. When you are a sailor, you are a person who sails. When a painter, a person who paints. The term, whether by passion or profession, defines the individual. A traveler is a person who travels, but it is much more than vacation–it is necessity. When you are a traveler, you are blessed… or cursed with a drive to discover.
Kerrin Rousset from MyKugelhopf:
Tourists are not looking for discovery; they are looking for the already discovered, and want to see it with their own eyes. The traveler, on the other hand, gets a thrill of discovering something on his or her own, knowing that far fewer people have seen it – or perhaps even no one else knows about it. He uses all of his senses in doing so, and makes the experience his own.
What about you? Do you think there’s a difference between “travellers” and “tourists”?
It’s one of those quintessential questions among travellers (or should I say tourists?), popping up like a stubborn weed on forums and blogs. But is there even a difference, or are tourists and travellers one and the same?
Here’s how 21 travel bloggers see it.
Craig Heimburger from TravelVice:
Tourists expect toilet paper — travelers carry their own (with the carton roll removed and pressed flat).
Ant Stone from Trail of Ants:
If you gave a tourist £500, they will visit one place, for one week while trying to emulate the insight of the traveller. If you gave a traveller £500, they will visit five places over five weeks while trying to avoid the habits of a tourist. When they return home, the traveller will say “the tourist blew their money” while the tourist will claim “the traveller blew their time”.
Personally, I think travellers who snub their noses at tourists are short-sighted. I’ve met hundreds of so-called travellers over the past nineteen months who say such things as “I’m not going there, it’s so touristy!” I wait five minutes and then ask them what they’ve done with their day. Museum. Monument. Market. McDonalds. There was me thinking they’d been laying grain out to dry after digging a new rice paddy. For the record, I’m a travelling tourist, or is it a touristy traveller?
Gary Arndt from Everything Everywhere:
There is no difference. It is a distinction used by pretentious people to make themselves feel superior to others. To the locals, no matter how long you’ve been traveling or whatever your mindset is, you are still a tourist. After two years on the road, I’m still a tourist when I show up somewhere new.
A better distinction is between traveling and vacation, which is a distinction between what you are doing, not who you are.
Tourists expect toilet paper — travelers carry their own (with the carton roll removed and pressed flat).
Melanie McMinn from Intrepid 101:
A traveller enters a new place with an open mind and a hunger to experience.
I know when I say this my geek will be showing, but nothing says it better than the Monty Python Tourist Sketch:
What’s the point of going abroad if you’re just another tourist carted around in buses surrounded by sweaty mindless oafs from Kettering and Coventry… complaining about the tea – “Oh they don’t make it properly here, do they, not like at home”… squirting Timothy White’s suncream all over their puffy raw swollen purulent flesh ‘cos they “overdid it on the first day”…
And sending tinted postcards of places they don’t realise they haven’t even visited to “All at number 22, weather wonderful, our room is marked with an ‘X’. Food very greasy but we’ve found a charming little local place hidden away in the back streets…where they serve Watney’s Red Barrel and cheese and onion…”
Pam Mandel from Nerd’s Eye View:
In a semantic dispute, one could argue that a traveler is anyone engaged in the act of travel. I traveled to the post office yesterday, downtown to dine with friends. More semantics: A tourist is anyone who is not a local or, alternatively, one who is in a location to tour, to see the sites. The underpinnings of this question are clear, though, to anyone who reads about travel. My take: This question must die. There’s no difference. None.
Jacquie Ross from Travelling Right, Travelling Light:
Oh, the aura, the romance, the mystique of the ‘traveller’. It just sounds more adventurous, more gritty, more authentic than the ‘tourist’. I can scarcely spit out the confession, so painful is the suspicion that my own travels were really more ‘tourist’ than ‘traveller’. But maybe it’s unavoidable. As a thirty-something, mid-career ‘tourist’, I had a very strong sense of what I wanted to achieve from my travels and it didn’t include finding – or, for that matter, losing – myself. With time far more limited than budget, I moved more quickly and – on occasion – more luxuriously than the ‘traveller’, deliberate trade-offs that inevitably (for the ‘traveller’) draw into question the authenticity of my experiences. And yet, at heart, there can be no difference at all between us. The thirst to grow through travel compels only some of us to action. What each of us gains from the adventure is of our own making, and the means – whether as a ‘tourist’ or as a ‘traveller’- mere semantics.
Aaron Joel Santos from From Swerve of Shore:
The differences may look large and wide and all, but in the end they are as fickle and frail as anything else. The definition-type traveler or tourist does not care to be anything else. But we’re hardly ever as easy to peg down as a dictionary definition. I’ve toured and traveled. I’m guessing you have too. A real experience in an unknown place is a very subjective experience, so who is the traveler to say that the tourist does not experience anything real, or vice-versa? We all want to think of ourselves as travelers, but staying in a cheap dorm with other westerners or drinking on the roof of our hostel does not make us one. It’s being open and accepting of new cultures, of different ways of living. The goal of traveling is to learn about yourself and about the world, and anyone can do that if they try. Even tourists.
The goal of traveling is to learn about yourself and about the world, and anyone can do that if they try. Even tourists.
Shelly Rivoli from Travels with Baby:
A tourist visits a destination and accepts the visit as an end in itself, happy to have seen and conquered the place, then he moves on. A traveler, on the other hand, is a traveler wherever he roams. He sees every destination—even the post office and the corner grocery store in his own hometown—as a point of departure. His world is one of infinite possibilities and endless stories, and it is no wonder that so many great writers have been travelers at heart.
Greg Wesson from Greg Wesson’s Esoteric Globe:
A tourist is the idiot I curse at because they have stopped in the middle of the sidewalk during a busy rush hour RIGHT IN FRONT OF ME to take a picture of some obscure feature on a building that no one who is a local notices or cares about. A traveller, which is what I am, is someone who gets off the beaten tourist path and to see and experience that which others miss, for example, a unique and architecturally significant feature on a building in the heart of the city. I always stop and take a picture, even though sometimes the locals curse at me for stopping right in front of them.
Yup, travellers… We are so different than tourists. I’m also smarter, a better driver and frankly I am more above average than even those kids in Lake Wobegon.
Dave from The Longest Way Home:
I think there is a politically correct difference, and then a difference that both a traveller and tourist will conjure up in their own minds about one another. Much like a ‘backpacker’ or ‘expat may wish to separate themselves from the two classes as well. It is relative to the individual and to a large extent the person looking at them trying to figure it all out. With the PC version out of the way, let me give my own personal view as I travel.
I consider myself a traveller, but am of course looked upon as a tourist when travelling. I class short termers, weekenders, short hop family vacationers who stay in one country and so on; more as tourists than travellers. Backpackers, long-termers and so forth over multi regions; I look more on as travellers. Travellers and tourists: one and the same, albeit depending on who’s looking at who.
Brooke from Brooke vs. the World:
Literally, a tourist is “a person who travels for pleasure”, while a traveler is “a person who changes location”. (WordNet) Perhaps this means that a tourist is just a person looking for a vacation, while a traveler is a person always looking for new scenery and adventure. Perhaps this means a tourist is someone taking the safe route, sticking to the city walls and dragging a suitcase, while a traveler is fearlessly trekking mountain paths after downsizing their lives to a single backpack. Perhaps I should try to further compare and define these two debatable terms, or maybe I should just save us all time by letting you infer what you wish from the two definitions above. ;)
Tammie Dooley from Solo Road Trip:
There isn’t any. Being a tourist has been spoiled by a few bad apples, while travelers have been over-romanticized. There’s the occasional overbearing, insensitive boars, clutching their entitlements like carry-on luggage. Then there are travelers waxing poetically about the lack of an itinerary, mingling with the locals, eating from street stalls, tipping our noses at those staying in 5 star hotels, riding around in cushy buses, being led around like lambs with meals and breaks mandated. Two weeks into a four week backpacking trip in China, I wanted to sell my son to be one of them. We travelers are a snobbish lot. I’m also a flyfisherman. I know about snobbery. It’s ugly; I’m guilty. The world deserves to see the world – tourist or traveler. Curiosity should be encouraged. The experience of sating it is an individual choice. Besides, without tourists to make fun of, we’d founder on our arrogance.
Lauren O’Farrell from Purl Interrupted:
A tourist is someone who travels to get to a certain place, their destination is their aim. For a tourist the travelling part is a means to an end, a series of connections and seats on transport. The adventure doesn’t start till the ‘getting there’ ends.
A traveller is someone who travels to travel. That twelve hour train journey drinking neat vodka with a giant beard of a Russian man while he tells you stories of his wild youth and slaps you on the back in an almost-painful gesture of fast friendship; the eight thigh-scraping hours you spend on lurching camel back to get to the desert sand dunes and sleep under the stars; the monkey who stole your cheese sandwich while you were waiting for your ‘luxury’ Indian bus to be repaired for the third time. All just as important as where you end up.
Lara Dunston from Cool Travel Guide:
I don’t buy into the ‘tourist vs traveller’ argument. I have too many bad memories of interminable discussions between backpackers when I was travelling around South America a decade ago. I couldn’t understand why my fellow ‘travellers’ weren’t more interested in discussing the place they were in and people they were meeting. As it turned out, it was because many weren’t even bothering to meet locals and weren’t really interested in getting beneath the skin of the places. They spent more time socialising at the hostel than they did out of it and appeared more consumed with the notion of being a ‘traveller’ and idea of ‘travelling’ than the actual reality. While they were all too ready to criticise ‘tourists’, i.e. those who travelled in big tour groups or individuals on arranged packages, from my own observations those ‘tourists’ were seeing more than their hotel room and were getting out and about and talking to locals, albeit local guides on organized excursions. For me the distinctions are superficial. The ‘grand tourists’ after all were the greatest travellers, spending years on the road, often months in a place, learning languages or the local art forms and traditions of different cultures. Yet to be a ‘tourist’ now is seen by those who identify themselves as ‘travellers’ as a negative label – to be a ‘sightseer’, ‘holidaymaker’ or day-tripper, someone who merely ‘passes through’ a place and gets a superficial experience of it – yet I don’t always think that’s true. I’m the last person to recommend an organized tour, but at the same time I don’t see ‘travellers’ as always travelling more authentically or more meaningfully than ‘tourists’. Whatever we want to call ourselves – or others – what’s more important than what we call ourselves is how we travel, how we experience a place and its people, how much we get out of that experience, and how much we give back. I see more value in focusing less on ourselves and our own identities and more on the world and the culture and people around us.
Debby from Tea, Sugar, a Dream:
The tourist might get the basics down, see some sights, take a few pictures, and go home, experiencing only the surface of a country. A traveler goes deeper.
A tourist, via definition, is somewhat similar to a traveler. But the connotation of a traveler, to me, implies a deeper intent than a tourist. Bermuda shorts, Hawaiian t-shirts, and white socks with sandals personifies a tourist. The tourist might get the basics down, see some sights, take a few pictures, and go home, experiencing only the surface of a country. A traveler goes deeper. A traveler explores the culture, the people, the traditions, the food, the lifestyles and inner workings of a country. A traveler gets more involved.
This is not to suggest that being a traveler is better than being a tourist, as there are some amazing sights to be seen, and I’m sure that many tourists appreciate where they are. But being a traveler demonstrates an understanding of this world that we all live in together.
Cate Dowman from Caffeinated Traveller:
The ongoing question and debate. Difficult to define as both share a common love for discovery but both are polar in thinking and style.
From my experience I think the difference has to do with awareness: The tourist is very much aware of who they are, what they are doing and why they are there.They know their role and don’t try to redfine it.
The traveller unfortunately, hasn’t reached that level of awareness yet. Too many people are stuck in this traveller mode.They are busy judging others travel style, but at the same time hanging around backpacker ghettos.Personally I wouldn’t put myself in either category and I’m sure many others wouldn’t as well. I would consider myself a hybrid – a cross between a tourist and a traveller, keeping all the good points. Perhaps we should coin a new word: travelist.
Nora Dunn from The Professional Hobo:
Being travel bloggers, I think we have all considered this dichotomy before. Rolf Potts writes somewhat indignantly about it in his most recent book, Marco Polo Didn’t Go There, suggesting that it is a pointless debate. And I can’t say I blame him; as much as people who believe they are “travelers” are staunchly against being “tourists”, the reality is that once we are on foreign ground, we may try to get off the beaten path or blend in, but we ultimately (usually) follow a well-trodden trail at some time. To me, the difference between a tourist and a traveler has become more about how long you stay somewhere, get to know the locals, and integrate into the community (if even for a short time), than it is about seeing the sights versus finding a dodgy place that tourists don’t go for the sake of being off the beaten path.
Anja Mutic from Ever the Nomad:
A traveler engages with the destination through interacting with people and respectfully exploring new landscapes. On the journey, a traveler seeks to capture the essence of the place and leaves with a deeper understanding of it. A tourist visits the destination for the pleasure and fun of a holiday. On the trip, a tourist seeks an intermission from everyday life and returns home with snapshots and souvenirs.
Thomas Stanley from America in 100 Days:
Today's travelers are very fortunate to have the wealth of readily available information that they do - from expert tourism books to online reviews and laptops to GPS technology. All of these things, however, offer the easy way through the expedition at hand. Sure, a preplanned itinerary may be tried and true, and you probably won't find many gifts from Dionysus at just any random sandwich shop. But it's making that judgment for yourself that separates the traveler from the tourist. The tourist is just that, in town for a tour and a taste of the local specialty. The traveler is out to blaze a trail, to savor every bite of whatever the waitress brings, and to reflect without anyone else's noise to distract.
Derek Turner from The World by Sea:
Tourist or traveler. At first glance, I thought it was nothing more than playful semantics. Yet as the terms have wrestled through my mind, I am convinced the difference is significant.
A tourist is a person whose motivation for travel is often to escape. Your aim: to find a beachside resort, or country cottage where for a moment in time you can forget about work and day-to-day stress… just relax. Someone else can cook, clean, and guide you to your daily destinations.
But a traveler is different. When you are a sailor, you are a person who sails. When a painter, a person who paints. The term, whether by passion or profession, defines the individual. A traveler is a person who travels, but it is much more than vacation–it is necessity. When you are a traveler, you are blessed… or cursed with a drive to discover.
Kerrin Rousset from MyKugelhopf:
Tourists are not looking for discovery; they are looking for the already discovered, and want to see it with their own eyes. The traveler, on the other hand, gets a thrill of discovering something on his or her own, knowing that far fewer people have seen it – or perhaps even no one else knows about it. He uses all of his senses in doing so, and makes the experience his own.
What about you? Do you think there’s a difference between “travellers” and “tourists”?
Monday, February 7, 2011
Ngong Ping Cable Car, Hongkong
Ngong Ping Cable Car is one of Hong Kong’s premier attractions and, while not cheap, if you’re in town for a few days it really shouldn’t be missed. The big pull of the Ngong Ping Cable Car is the breathtaking views over the thick green peaks of Lantau and the shining South China Sea. At the top of the cable car ride awaits the amazing 110ft Tian Tan Giant Buddha, one of the biggest in the world
The Ngong Ping is a gondola cable car that travels 5.7km between Tung Chung Town Centre and Ngong Ping Village on Lantau Island. The journey takes around 25 minutes. Each car carries up to seventeen people, with seats for ten, you may request to only board a car with seats available.
The cable car offers outstanding views over the lush greenery of Lantau as well as the glimmering South China Sea. The views really are stunning and offer a unique opportunity to grab a bird eye’s view of Hong Kong’s often overlooked green jungle.
At the Ngong Ping Village you’ll find one of Hong Kong’s most impressive attractions, a giant bronze statue of Buddha nestled amongst the trees. Part of the Po Lin Monastery complex, the Tian Tan Buddha stands at a towering 110ft and weighs in at over 200 tons, making it one of the biggest Buddha statues in the world. It’s truly a jaw dropping scene.
Oman Beaches
One of the Middle East's least explored countries, Oman, is a richly textured holiday destination that suits holidaymakers looking for a beach holiday with a difference.
Beach:
With its 1,700km coastline (1,056 miles) Oman offers a wealth of clean and attractive beaches. Some of the most popular holiday beaches include Qurum, Bandar Jissah and As-Sawadi. Even on hotel beaches holidaymakers should be aware of local sensibilities to avoid causing any offence, i.e. no topless bathing or very revealing swimwear. A variety of watersports are also available.
Beyond the beach:
The capital city of Muscat is a captivating place to visit on a day trip. Unlike some of the other ultra modern cities in the region Muscat is alive with history and holidaymakers can enjoy a city that builds a bridge between various worlds. The city also boasts numerous parks and impressive mosques, as well as great value shopping.
Exploring further afield:
Just across the border is the United Arab Emirate of Dubai. This popular destination has developed in recent years beyond all recognition. The deserts have many of the same charms as Oman's with wadi and dune bashing trips, while the actual city offers boat cruises, first class duty-free shopping, atmospheric souks and the wide sweep of Jumeirah Beach. Dubai's restaurants also span the world in terms of choice with all major global cuisines on offer in venues that range from casual street stalls through to classy restaurants.
Bungee Jumping, Queensland New Zealand
Bungee jumping (also spelled "Bungy" jumping)[1][2] is an activity that involves jumping from a tall structure while connected to a large elastic cord. The tall structure is usually a fixed object, such as a building, bridge or crane; but it is also possible to jump from a movable object, such as a hot-air-balloon or helicopter, that has the ability to hover above the ground. The thrill comes as much from the free-falling as from the rebounds.[3]
When the person jumps, the cord stretches and the jumper flies upwards again as the cord snaps back, and continues to oscillate up and down until all the energy is dissipated.
he word "bungee" (pronounced /ˈbʌndʒiː/) originates from West Country dialect, meaning "Anything thick and squat",as defined by James Jennings in his book "Observations of Some of the Dialects in The West of England" published 1825. Around 1930 the name became used for a rubber eraser. The word bungy, as used by A J Hackett, is "Kiwi slang for an Elastic Strap".[4] Cloth-covered rubber cords with hooks on the ends have been available for decades under the generic name bungy cords.
In the 1950s David Attenborough and a BBC film crew brought back footage of the "land divers" (known as "Naghol") of Pentecost Island in Vanuatu, young men who jumped from tall wooden platforms with vines tied to their ankles as a test of their courage and passage into manhood.[5] A similar practice, only with a much slower pace for falling, has been practised as the Danza de los Voladores de Papantla or the 'Papantla flyers' of central Mexico, a tradition dating back to the days of the Aztecs.
A tower 4,000 feet (1,200 m) high with a system to drop a “car” suspended by a cable of “best rubber” was proposed for the Chicago World Fair, 1892-1893. The car, seating two hundred people, would be shoved from a platform on the tower and then bounce to a stop. The designer engineer suggested that for safety the ground below “be covered with eight feet of feather bedding”. The proposal was declined by the Fair’s organizers.[6]
Bungee at Kawarau Bridge
The first modern bungee jumps were made on 1 April 1979 from the 250-foot (76 m) Clifton Suspension Bridge in Bristol, by David Kirke, Chris Baker, Simon Keeling, Tim Hunt and Alan Weston of the Oxford University Dangerous Sports Club.[7] The jumpers were arrested shortly after, but continued with jumps in the US from the Golden Gate and Royal Gorge bridges, (this last jump sponsored by and televised on the American program That's Incredible) spreading the concept worldwide. By 1982 they were jumping from mobile cranes and hot air balloons.
Commercial bungee jumping began with the New Zealander, A J Hackett, who made his first jump from Auckland's Greenhithe Bridge in 1986.[8] During the following years Hackett performed a number of jumps from bridges and other structures (including the Eiffel Tower), building public interest in the sport, and opening the world's first permanent commercial bungee site; the Kawarau Bridge Bungy at Queenstown in the South Island of New Zealand.[9] Hackett remains one of the largest commercial operators, with concerns in several countries.
Despite the inherent danger of jumping from a great height, several million successful jumps have taken place since 1980. This is attributable to bungee operators rigorously conforming to standards and guidelines governing jumps, such as double checking calculations and fittings for every jump. As with any sport, injuries can still occur (see below), and there have been fatalities. A relatively common mistake in fatality cases is to use a cord that is too long. The cord should be substantially shorter than the height of the jumping platform to allow it room to stretch. When the cord reaches its natural length the jumper either starts to slow down or keeps accelerating depending upon the speed of descent. One may not even start to slow until the cord has been stretched a significant amount, because the cord's resistance to distortion is zero at the natural length, and increases only gradually after, taking some time to even equal the jumper's weight. See also Potential energy for a discussion of the spring constant and the force required to distort bungee cords and other spring-like objects.
Jetski, white island , Camiguin Philippines
Jet Ski is the brand name of personal watercraft (PWC) manufactured by Kawasaki Heavy Industries. The name is sometimes mistakenly used by those unfamiliar with the personal watercraft industry to refer to any type of personal watercraft; however, the name is a valid trademark registered with the United States Patent and Trademark Office, and in many other countries.[1] Jet Ski (or JetSki, often shortened to "Ski"[2]) originally referred to PWCs with pivoting handlepoles manipulated by a standing rider; these are now known as "stand-up PWC's." Today the term "Jet Ski" is often used when referring to WaveRunners, but WaveRunner is actually the name of the Yamaha line of sit-down PWC's, whereas Jet Ski refers to the Kawasaki line.[3][4] Recently, a third type has also appeared, where the driver sits in the seiza position. This type has been pioneered by Silveira Customs with their "Samba".
The "Jet Ski" was preceeded in 1929 by a one-man standing unit called the "Skiboard" which was guided by the operator standing and shifting his weight while holding on to a rope on the front, similar to a powered surfboard.[5] While somewhat popular when it was first introduced in the late 1920s, the Great Depression sent it into oblivion.[citation needed]
What the world now knows at the "Jet Ski" was first invented by Matt Bradley in 1968 while trying to invent a "Bus for the sea". He ran out of money in 1970 and was forced to give up on his plans, and in 1971 an unknown person managed to get the design and sold it to Kawasaki. In 1973 Kawasaki produced a limited number of Bradley's designed stand-up models, though at the time they did not know it was Bradley who had invented it. The 2 original models included the 1973 WSAA Jet Ski 400, and the WSAB Jet Ski 400. The WSAA featured a flat bottom design that stayed with the JS hull until 1994. The WSAB featured a V-hull which carves turns better, but is much less stable and harder to ride. Therefore only 500 of these WSAB Jet Skis were produced. Also, 1973-1974 models were made of hand-laid fiberglass. In 1975, Kawasaki began mass production of the JS400-A. The mass production JS was made of an SMC hull. JS400s came with 400 cc two-stroke engines and hulls based upon the previous limited release models. It became the harbinger of the success Jet Skis would see in the PWC market through the 1990s. In 1978, the Jet Ski 440 was introduced. It came with a new jet pump, handlebar mounted ignition controls, and a 440cc 2 stroke engine. The 440 engine was almost the same as the old 400, but had a bigger cylinder bore.
In 1982, the Jet Ski 550 became available for purchase. Not only did this new 550 have an engine that made more power than a 440, but the engine was identical to the 440, had a bigger cylinder bore, and had a new exhaust pipe for added power. The 550 also has a unique "mixed flow" pump which provides better low end thrust to get out of the hole quicker. The 1982 JS 550 was available in yellow paint with red decals. The 1983-1985 550s have red hulls with a left front exhaust exit. The 550s from 1986-1989 are red with a lower right front exhaust exit. The 1990-1994 JS 550sx models are white and have a rear exit exhaust. This line of JS watercrafts maintained very similar designs throughout their production from 1973-1994, and it is still the only watercraft to have remained in production for so long.
In 1986, Kawasaki broadened the world of Jet Skis by introducing a one person model with lean-in "sport" style handling and a 650 cc engine, dubbed the X-2. Then in 1989, they introduced their first two passenger "sit-down" model, the Tandem Sport/Dual-Jetters (TS/DJ) with a step-through seating area. Kawasaki began using four-stroke engines in 2003. Combining this with the use of other technologies such as superchargers has allowed some engines to be able to produce up to 260 horsepower (190 kW), as seen in the newly released Kawasaki Ultra 260X and Sea-Doo RXP, RXT and RXP-X.
Yamaha entered the PWC market in 1987. Bombardier entered the market in 1988. Arctic and Polaris entered the market in the early 1990s. As the riding of personal watercraft evolved through the 1990s, other companies such as Yamaha, Bombardier and Polaris, elevated the use of personal watercraft to worldwide sport in both racing and freestyle.
Kalgoorlie, Western Australia
Kalgoorlie, known as Kalgoorlie-Boulder, is a city in the Goldfields-Esperance region of Western Australia, and is located 595 kilometres (370 mi) east-northeast of state capital Perth at the end of the Great Eastern Highway. The city was founded in 1893 during the Yilgarn-Goldfields gold rush, and is located close to the so-called "Golden Mile".
It has a population of 28,246,[1] making it the largest urban centre in the Goldfields-Esperance region and the fifth-largest in Western Australia.
The name Kalgoorlie is derived from the Wangai word Karlkurla, meaning "place of the silky pears
In January 1893, prospectors Patrick (Paddy) Hannan, Tom Flanagan, and Dan O'Shea were travelling to Mount Youle when one of their horses cast a shoe. During the halt in their journey, the men noticed signs of gold in the area, and decided to stay put. On 17 June 1893, Hannan filed a Reward Claim, leading to hundreds of men swarming to the area in search of gold and Kalgoorlie, originally called Hannan's, was born.[2]
The mining of gold, along with other metals such as nickel, has been a major industry in Kalgoorlie ever since, and today employs about one-quarter of Kalgoorlie's workforce and generates a significant proportion of its income. The concentrated area of large gold mines surrounding the original Hannan find is often referred to as the Golden Mile, and is considered by some to be the richest square mile of earth on the planet. The town's population was about 30,000 people in 1903 and began to grow into nearby Boulder.
Kalgoorlie after the 1934 race riots
The narrow gauge Government railway line reached Kalgoorlie in 1896, and the main named railway service from Perth was the overnight sleeper train The Westland which ran until the 1970s. In 1917, a standard gauge railway line was completed, connecting Kalgoorlie to the city of Port Augusta, South Australia across 2,000 kilometres (1,243 mi) of desert, and consequently the rest of the eastern states. The standardisation of the railway connecting Perth (which changed route from the narrow gauge route) in 1968 completed the Sydney-Perth railway, making it possible for rail travel from Perth to Sydney—and the Indian Pacific rail service commenced soon after. During the 1890s, the Goldfields area boomed as a whole, with an area population exceeding 200,000, mainly prospectors. The area gained a notorious reputation for being a wild west with bandits and prostitutes. This rapid increase in population led to a proposed new state of Auralia but with the sudden diaspora after the Gold Rush led to plans falling through.
Places, famous or infamous, that Kalgoorlie is noted for include its water pipeline, designed by C. Y. O'Connor, which brings in fresh water from Mundaring Weir near Perth; its Hay Street brothels (the street itself was apparently named after Hay Street, Perth); its two-up school; the goldfields railway loopline; the Kalgoorlie Town Hall; the Paddy Hannan statue/drinking fountain; the Super Pit; and Mount Charlotte lookout. Its main street is Hannan Street, named after the town's founder. One of the infamous brothels also serves as a museum and is a major national attraction.
Kalgoorlie and the surrounding district was serviced by an extensive collection of suburban railways and tramways, providing for both passenger and freight traffic.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)